Wednesday, October 24, 2012

Crackpot Doctors?


Growing up in American society, I have always looked at the profession of “doctor” as having great esteem. Most children today are welcomed into the world by a medical doctor. In the past it was common for midwives to bring a child into the world, but with the growth of the American medical system, the amount of medical doctors and biomedicine has increased and become the new normal. We have gotten used to the idea of going to the doctor’s office for any ailment that seems to be bothering us and have expected to just be given a magical pill to solve the problem. I do not know if it is because I live in the Seattle area, known to be more cutting edge and new age, but in recent years I have seen an increase in naturopathic medicine and the use of naturopathic doctors. People who in the past would just go to the good old doctor’s office for medication are checking into new approaches to achieve wellness like naturopathy. Many of the practices of naturopathic doctors are actually the implementations of eastern medicine.  While many people are utilizing the alternative healing approaches, many are hesitant and even think this new treatment is crazy business. In an article by a licensed naturopathic doctor, Michael Stanclift, he tries to defend his profession as an actual science since so many Americans are weary. “When I say ‘naturopathic doctor,’ to some folks it conjures up ideas of magic wands, potions, and Kramer's holistic healer friend on Seinfeld” (Stanclift). Because Americans are so set on their own etiology of what healthcare should be, they misjudge any other treatments since they are different and do not follow the status quo. In Lecture, Alejandro focused a lot on how the current medicalization in the US has been primarily caused by the need to be normal. Health is associated with normal and in the US, biomedicines are normal.
In my own life I have seen how American etiology affects people’s perceptions. In recent years I have opened my eyes upon becoming a naturopathic doctor myself. When people ask me my intended profession however, I am hesitant to tell them what it is because of fear that they will mock my choice as being a false profession. My brother for example thinks that naturopathic remedies are basically fake medicine. He does not recognize it being a valid source of medical help. Janzen’s article, “The Fabric of Health” contradicts this idea.

“Not only have scholars documented the hundreds of applications of medicinal plants by herbalist, healers, and lay people alike, but the Native American pharmacopoeia has given to global medicine such important drugs as quinine, aspirin, digitalis, as well as medicinally applied stimulants such as cocoa, coca, and tobacco" (Janzen).

Many Americans do not actually realize that the medications they are already using come from natural remedies. While, yes, biomedicines have been modified in the lab, their active ingredients come from natural sources that actually can help human health. Americans tend to either not realize this or deny that the natural form of the drugs can actually be helpful. Another thing to note is that naturopathic doctors do not just spend their time prescribing the use of herbs and other natural products or medicines. The major point of their field is to look at the overall health of a person and assess how their lifestyle may be affecting their quality of health. In his article Standclift says,

“We spend that time getting to know each patient as a person. We ask about everything that's going on with them physically, emotionally, and oftentimes spiritually. When making a specific recommendation or prescription, we spend time explaining treatment options and answering questions. We aim to teach our patients about their health, and how they can care for it” (Stanclift).

So while a naturopathic doctor could be spending all their time prescribing alternative medicine, their real overall goal is to give an overall assessment of the patient and then to give them a way to fix it that is less invasive than a typical medical doctor’s approach. Witchcraft and magical herbs do not have to be in the picture.
Acupuncture has become a more commonly accepted treatment for different medical conditions. This type of therapy is an eastern medicine that can be recommended by a naturopathic doctor.

In eastern countries, the converse is true considering general feelings towards biomedicine. Many countries that have historically used natural methods of healing do not feel the need for biomedicines. Western medicine has become the world standard, but it is not necessarily what every human being wants to be treated with. The video in class demonstrated an excellent example of this. In India, they are aware of biomedicines but they prefer their natural remedies instead. They actually believe that their own therapies work better. So while in America, we find biomedicine and medical doctors to be the “normal” and therefore the correct form of healing; other areas of the world have a completely different standard of what healing should look like.
My point of all of this is to bring up how in the US, many of us have a false representation of the medical system. We have grown up in a certain environment with standard medical practices. Healthcare has become “averaged.” We must all fit a certain category and if we don’t, we must all go to a medical doctor for treatment. Our view is skewed because of our perception. If we take a more worldly view of healthcare, we might be able to see that there are alternative methods that aren't necessarily inferior. In fact, many foreign therapies are less invasive, have better response and have fewer side effects than typical biomedicine. In the Seattle area, I see a rise in naturopathic doctors on the horizon. My hope is that the trend continues to the rest of the country and becomes more accepted as a valid profession and treatment source. It definitely feels foreign, but that does not discount its validity. If I do decide that becoming a naturopathic doctor is in my future, I hope that it releases a stigma of respect and not something that I have to be embarrassed to share with random people let alone to my family.

Stacie Larsen

Janzen. "The Fabric of Health." N.p., 2002. Web. 23 Oct. 2012.
Stanclift, N.D., Michael. "You're What Kind of Doctor?" The Huffington Post. TheHuffingtonPost.com, 09 Oct. 2012. Web. 24 Oct. 2012. <http://www.huffingtonpost.com/michael-stanclift-nd/naturopathic-doctors_b_1923371.html>.


1 comment:

  1. First off, I agree with Stacie completely. The fact of the matter is that western medicine is dominant in healthcare all over the world, and this is often associated with thoughts of western superiority. As we have studied in past weeks, the root of this “western mentality” is from colonialism and slavery. In almost every land that Europeans expanded to, the particular natives were perceived as barbaric, thus their cultural practices perceived as inferior. This is especially true for indigenous people groups in Africa and the Americas. Closed mindedness and lack of understanding due to language barriers were factors that added to biased cultural rankings. In present day, although there are available means for understanding different cultures via technological advances, many westerners are either biased against nontraditional medicine or simply are unaware of other practices, therefore their limited knowledge gave way to which practices they deem as legitimate or illegitimate.
    “Healthcare has become ‘averaged.’ We must all fit a certain category and if we don’t, we must all go to a medical doctor for treatment. Our view is skewed because of our perception. If we take a more worldly view of healthcare, we might be able to see that there are alternative methods that aren't necessarily inferior.” (Larsen)
    Stacie states that the nontraditional medical practices that most of us westerners neglect because of biases may actually be better suited for certain individuals compared to the “treat all” methods of western medicine.
    I have personal experiences with naturopathic medical practices because of my Korean ethnicity. Frankly, I was unaware of the skepticism surrounding non-traditional medical practices. Since I’ve grown up surrounded by two cultures, I’ve become familiar with both western medicine and traditional Korean/East Asian remedies. In Korea, acupuncture is a widely practiced treatment. In many cases, it is not even seen as an alternative method of treatment, but a first choice. I know that my parents have undergone acupuncture when they suffered muscle or joint pain. In fact, acupuncture is accepted as a treatment for a variety of conditions such as headaches. In another case, my brother and I had severe dry skin/eczema when we were growing up and my parents would regularly buy herbal medicine for us to drink. There was no question as to whether the treatment worked or not since it was an obvious choice to provide the rightful medicine for our conditions.
    Because I am a Korean-American, I am accustomed to two very different cultures, which consequentially shapes my perceptions about my views on acceptable medicine. Because my parents never questioned the legitimacy of naturopathic medicine, I am inclined to do the same. I’ve learned that the relationship between western medicine and naturopathic medicine is not mutually exclusive one, meaning that just because I acknowledge acupuncture and herbal medicine as legitimate does not mean that I distrust in healthcare practiced by the United States, or vice versa. Had I not been cultured in my Korean heritage, I would probably be just as skeptical about non-traditional medicine as the average American citizen, and I would have not received beneficial treatment. Therefore, this proves that a variety of experiences and knowledge is key to openness and greater understanding, which is ultimately to the beneficial to the individual.

    Ann Lee

    ReplyDelete