Wednesday, October 24, 2012

Wellness Anxiety: A Stressor on Public Health


Hypochondria, also known as wellness anxiety or health anxiety, can be defined as an excess of concern for a person’s own physical health combined with a belief that the person is or will become ill.  Generally, no clinically identifiable disease will be present in the individual at all.  This non-existent condition—the object of the patient’s anxiety— might be the product of personal research, in which the sufferer perceives himself as having various symptoms and tries desperately to find a common root cause. The object of the anxiety may also have vague origins.  During my time as an EMT in a small-town hospital, I had the opportunity of observing a number of individuals who might have been suffering from wellness anxiety.  I say “might” because it is very difficult to distinguish patients who have psychosomatic symptoms from those who might actually be ill.  The fact remains that hypochondria places a burden on public health by causing actual health problems, dividing the attention of dedicated healthcare professionals, providing an easy fix for the less dedicated, and generating financial burdens.
Wellness anxiety, as with any form of anxiety, can put stress on the human body.  It can contribute to problems such as hypertension (high blood pressure) and malnutrition.  The patient might actually forget to eat because they are so worried about being ill, and that ends up making them sick.  Another major problem among many hypochondriacs is a propensity to self-medicate.   A doctor at my old hospital once described a case where an apparently healthy 27-year-old man had collapsed and vomited blood.  The cause of this was a perforated ulcer; the patient nearly bled to death into his stomach before the perforation could be repaired.   After taking a complete medical history, it was found that the patient had been taking daily doses of aspirin since high school.  His grandfather had died of a heart attack when he was younger, and when he learned that heart disease ran in the family, he became convinced that he would get it too.  The subsequent anxiety led to self-medicating with aspirin (to thin the blood), which likely caused the bleeding.  A less specific and potentially more disastrous instance of self-medication is the abuse of antibiotics.  This can be seen in the case of women in northeastern Thailand in the 1990s. Many of these women, excessively concerned about poorly understood risks to reproductive health, would, according to Nichter, “engage in inappropriate self-medication with antibiotics for a wide range of symptoms in an attempt to reduce their risk of cancer” (32).  This use of antibiotics by hypochondriacs as a means of treatment for non-existent bacterial infections and other inappropriate ailments can have far reaching consequences, including the emergence of antibiotic resistant strains that could potentially kill thousands.  In less developed nations, misuse of antibiotics also reduces the supply available for fighting legitimate infections.  These are just a few examples of how wellness anxiety can, like a self-fulfilling prophecy, have an adverse effect on health in a biomedical context. 


                  Whenever I have the opportunity to observe an ER doctor at work on a particularly busy shift, it calls to mind an image similar to the one above.  It is of a professional juggling the responsibilities of his chosen profession, seemingly without effort.  Of course, the more balls you throw in the mix, the harder it is to keep them all in the air.  Consider this scenario: An ER doctor has six patients, three with severe lacerations and three complaining of stomach pain.  Two of the bellyachers are hypochondriacs with mild indigestion and the third has appendicitis.  Long story short, the last man’s appendix bursts and kills him before the doctor has a chance to make a thorough examination, in large part because the ER is too crowded for a Tuesday night.  It may be unfair to blame the two patients with wellness anxiety for the death of the last man.  After all, they are suffering from a potentially debilitating anxiety disorder.  Nevertheless, the fact that their disorder was not recognized long ago and referred to a psychiatrist did put an extra strain on the ER staff, which may have led to mistakes being made.  Caution must be exercised in this line of thinking, however; it can be a double-edged sword.
                  Joseph Heller wrote in Catch-22, “Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean they aren't after you.”  Applied to this context, “they” is referring to a wide range of physical diseases.  If a person is convinced they have a disease, they actually might have one.  Unfortunately, issues like hypochondria, anxiety, and stress have become crutches for indolent diagnosticians everywhere.  What they really mean when they diagnose a person as stressed after a just few minutes is, “I don’t know what’s wrong you, and I’m too lazy/cheap to find out.” Most people, including myself, have heard more than a few stories about this exact phenomenon.  Among those anecdotes are the confirmed second-opinion diagnoses of West Nile virus, mono, and bacterial meningitis.  Some practitioners have the habit of diagnosing “stress” and “exaggeration” after a single visit from a patient.  That is a disturbing trend.  A patient should be thoroughly vetted before such assumptions are made.  This will oftentimes require repeat visits.
                  Repeated medical appointments, numerous ER visits, and insistence on unnecessary tests can be both costly and time consuming.  The time lost can translate into lost income and loss of health coverage.  This places a burden on individuals suffering from a mental condition, one that might have been treated in therapy for a fraction of the cost of an MRI, a biopsy, or whatever tests the patient insisted on.   When the wellness anxiety becomes unmanageable and the patient can no longer pay their bills, a burden is placed on the healthcare institution.  This could, in an ideal capitalist system, increase the cost of healthcare for everybody else.  Whether or not that is the case, there can be no arguing that expensive habits of any kind have adverse effects on both society and the individual.
                  The real question is how to address the problem of wellness anxiety and reduce its negative consequences.  Aside from raising awareness of hypochondria as a mental disorder and encouraging those affected to seek therapy, I believe a more thorough understanding of the condition and its influencing factors would be beneficial.  To solve this and other practical problems, it might be helpful to further bridge the divide between medical anthropology and current healthcare practitioners.


Sources

Nichter, Mark (2008). Global health: why cultural perceptions, social representations, and biopolitics matter. Tucson: University of Arizona Press. Pp 23-132.

Heller, Joseph (1961). Catch-22. New York: Simon and Schuster.

4 comments:

  1. You chose a very interesting subject to write on! I have been thinking a lot lately about the way ER’s are used and what constitutes “abuse” of the resource. I was not thinking specifically about persons with wellness anxiety but I did consider people with mental illness and their myriad forms and reasons for visiting ER’s. I too have worked in health care and experienced persons behaving in ways that suggest an illness that would be better treated by a mental health professional. I remember one case when a patient told medical staff that they had a pain right over their heart and then began clutching the left side of their chest. I think you make some really valid points about the system failing and the stress this illness and the behavior involved, puts on individuals and institutions. I also think that you made an important point in mentioning the failure of health care providers to diagnose. “(I)ssues like hypochondria, anxiety, and stress have become crutches for indolent diagnosticians everywhere.” Some practitioners are imbalanced, either paying too little attention to the real problem of mental illness or ignoring the patient all together.

    More and more I am coming to recognize that anthropology is all about asking why. In a recent discussion with a mentor about the issue of ER “abuse” or misuse, I put forth all the behaviors that many health care providers view as misuse of the ER. From people using the ER as a homeless shelter to people without insurance using it as a clinic, even coming in for follow up after a first treatment. My mentor told me I must look at why these people are doing what they are doing. Why are the physicians not treating a mental condition but continually putting a band-aide on the situation? One possibility is that the M.D. has a fear of malpractice suit. Another is the lack of EMR that can be cross-referenced, it can be hard for an ER doc to diagnose and treat wellness anxiety without having a GP involved. Something else to consider is the idea of nocebo as discussed in lecture today (11/5) and I think the case of the 27 year old with the perforated ulcer is a good example. He thought he was going to be sick and actually made himself sick, although it was his GI tract and not his heart.
    I agree that anthology could help in this area by looking at all the “whys.” I think that the term wellness anxiety sounds more PC than hypochondriac, but there is still a lot of stigma surrounding this type of behavior or the perceived mental state of people exhibiting this set of behaviors. It would be interesting to see if wellness anxiety is a culture-bound syndrome and if not, how do other cultures hand it?

    ReplyDelete
  2. This blog touches on multiple issues we’ve been discussing in class such as what defines a health condition, how culture determines the legitimacy of a patient’s issue, and how in the context of public health, doctors must decide how to deal with varying interpretations of health. These issues are at the root of the discussion in this blog about hypochondria, also known as “wellness anxiety,” described in this post as an “excess of concern for a person’s own physical health combined with a belief that the person is or will become ill,” while the person has no sign of a clinical health issue. Having had experience as an EMT, this blogger pointed out how difficult it can be to determine whether a patient is actually ill or whether they are suffering from wellness anxiety. Sharing a couple of examples, he emphasizes the impact hypochondria has on public on health, making the point that it takes up the valuable time of medical professionals and wastes resources, while it can also be very dangerous since people often try to self medicate to solve their “problem.” This blogger expresses that there is a need to keep from hypochondria from negatively affecting public health systems. He concludes that it might be necessary to “bridge the divide between medical anthropology and current healthcare practitioners” in order to fully solve the issue.

    I had never heard of hypochondria before, but I thought it was very interesting, and very relevant to what we’ve been discussing in class over the past few weeks. I understand and to an extent agree with this blogger, that hypochondria can be burdensome to health care systems and problematic for physicians, but I think that we need to look a little deeper into the issues and realize that it might not be simply a result of an anxiety disorder. I think that they are forgetting to look at the issue beyond their own biomedical lens. This is an example of how in America, we’ve medicalized health in such a way that stress and anxiety have been put on a spectrum from normal to a disorder. I find it interesting that in this case, even though these patients are obviously not satisfied with their health conditions, their concerns are considered illegitimate, because there is no disease that can be detected by biomedical techniques. It’s also interesting to see how the culture of biomedicine not only affects the thought process of the practitioner but also the patient. Obviously they don’t feel right for some reason and because of the biomedical lens with which they view their health, they’ve turned whatever their problem is into an issue that requires biomedical treatment as opposed to a lifestyle change, or some other form of calming treatment. Instead of the doctors viewing the patient as having an “anxiety disorder,” or the patient being convinced they are suffering from a medical condition, other cultures could deal with these issues more appropriately. In Chinese medicine, the issue might be seen as an imbalance of Yin and Yang, or in Ayurveda medicine, the person might be experiencing an imbalance in energies. Once again, I think this proves that even the lens of biomedicine can limit people in their ability to assess and deal with their health problems. I think that in order for this issue, or “disorder” to be solved, people need to be able to look at issues in their lives outside of a medical context.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I really enjoyed this post and this is an entertaining topic to discuss. I think that it is an important issue to analyze in this age of medicalization. Mental health, and specifically wellness anxieties, is an issue regarding our definition of health and illness. If someone comes into a doctor’s office saying they aren’t feeling well, I don’t think it is necessarily in the doctor’s right to tell them that they are wrong and that they are okay. There is a point, however, where I do think there is nothing that a doctor can do, so it eventually becomes burdensome if someone keeps seeking medical attention for the same continuous ailment. Nevertheless, I don’t think that means that they are not ill to a certain extent, just not ill in the manner that biomedicine can help.

    In one of my previous medical anthropology classes, we discussed how medical students and doctors view patients according to their complaints. “Hypochondriac” patients were discussed as being frustrating because they do not enhance their learning or expand their knowledge. When having the choice to deal with a patient who is complaining of a common stomachache, perhaps from anxiety, like mentioned in the blog post, or a patient with a gushing wound or in the midst of a heart attack, the medical students would probably be more amped about the visually stimulating situation and write off the other as if it wasn’t affecting that other person.

    I liked the point in the post about the appendix-bursting patient intertwined with the hypochondriacs’ common bellyaches. I think a big issue is that our biomedical system is so based on textbooks that if someone doesn’t have something that they learned in medical school, then they must be insane. At the same time, I think hospitals and clinics are terribly crowded, so doctors aren’t taking their time to treat patients, but instead just doing their rounds as routine. Biomedicine is a very hardline approach to human health, but I think humankind is too abundant to have it any other way. Personally, I think health is far more than what medical school teaches you, but it incorporates one’s lifestyle and surroundings. There is just not enough space or time to analyze every aspect of a person’s life to see why their health anxiety, for instance, is happening.

    I think that our culture is way too medicalization, too. I was just watching the news all night because of the elections, which I am sure much of America was, and I think industries jumped on this time to capture consumers. There were so many pharmaceutical commercials! One particular one caught my eye. It was about heartburn and acid reflex where a doctor is being advertised as taking over a baseball pitcher’s role during a game. The commentary asks the audience why you, the consumer, should be doing the doctor’s job when you don’t want them doing yours. It then continues to tell you that only a doctor can diagnose if the heartburn is a serious problem and if this particular drug can help. Sure, doctors are very well educated, but I think it is ridiculous that doctors are being advertised as omniscient, especially about someone else’s body.

    I think this post brings up a good point and one that can lead to many different topics; medicalization, health definitions, and biomedical culture to name a few. I strongly agree that stress can cause health implications, but I don’t think we need to start publically medicalizing health anxiety because it will just lead to even more stress, therefore more complications. The media needs to stop creating a disease for every little symptom. If I Google how I am feeling right now (tired, weak, heavy eyes), conditions such as glaucoma, anemia, dementia, or aspirin poisoning arise, when I really just need to sleep more.

    ReplyDelete

  4. Hypochondriasis, also known as wellness anxiety, is exactly what its name means. People are said to have hypochondria when they are overly worried and self diagnose or seek medical attention for serious illnesses without any legitimate medical evidence. It is not a matter of having slightly excess health concerns, but is an uncontrollable condition where people exert unrealistic fears and anxiety about their personal wellbeing, which causes them to correlate inconclusive and probably insignificant bodily symptoms with a much more serious medical diagnosis. Stephen writes in his blog post that this psychological condition can be potentially disastrous to the individual. The example given was a case of a seemingly healthy young man who suffered from a perforated ulcer after taking aspirin daily in order to prevent heart disease, which he believed he would contract because of his genetic inheritance. The other, more widespread, consequence of hypochondriasis is that people with this condition, frankly speaking, waste the time of physicians and other health professionals, preventing the proper allocation of time and resources to people who are genuinely need it. In a hospital, the minutes that a physician spends with someone with hypochondriasis can be critical to the life or death for other patients; therefore there the implications are grave. The correct treatment for these people is not that can be given by an emergency room physician but a psychotherapist. The proper diagnosis of hypochondria is a practical and ethical issue because misdiagnosis implies that the patient is foretelling false medical information or that the doctor is mistrusting. The solutions that Stephen proposes are increasing awareness and a deeper understanding of hypochondria, which I agree would be helpful to relieve the consequences.
    “Aside from raising awareness of hypochondria as a mental disorder and encouraging those affected to seek therapy, I believe a more thorough understanding of the condition and its influencing factors would be beneficial. To solve this and other practical problems, it might be helpful to further bridge the divide between medical anthropology and current healthcare practitioners.” (Stephen)

    Hypochondriasis is interesting because it is essentially a disparity in an individual’s perceived illness with the objective medical science that distinguishes sick from healthy. Therefore the person’s illness experience does not correlate with the corresponding proper definition of health diseases. According to Recurrentdepression.com, “the prevalence of hypochondriasis in the general population is 1%-5%. Among primary care outpatients, estimates of current prevalence range from 2% to 7%.” These numbers indicate a fairly high prevalence. I can recognize traces of hypochondriasis even within my vicinity. It is probably not any form of fully expressed hypochondriasis but people in my family and friends often self-diagnose themselves when they experience abnormal symptoms. The means for self-diagnosis is predominately via the Internet. The limitless information offered by current technology is a vice and a virtue. It can be helpful for people who do extensive research and gain full understanding of their symptoms; however it can have adverse effects and even cause unnecessary anxiety for people who simply look up their symptoms stop their research after finding connections to serious diseases. In all honesty, almost everything seems to be an indication/cause of cancer these days. Because most people will fall under the latter group, an underlying concern of health and wellbeing is common among the general public. Yet the sentiment of excessive concern may be heightened in our current era because of the Internet.

    Ann Lee

    ReplyDelete